When it
comes to quantity, more is better, right? I am talking about things we desire,
good things, desirable things like certain types of foods, or possessions, or
money = more is always better. OK, so we agree on this. But then the question
is asked: "What is the cost?". More might be better, but it does cost
something, because nothing, absolutely nothing is absolutely free - agreed?
So this
becomes somewhat of a paradox: we want more, but we have to be willing to pay
the price. More food means more calories and potential cost of weight gain.
More possessions means potentially more debt, or at least the cost of more
responsibility for your stuff. More money usually means more work, and that in
turn costs time with family or friends, and so on. As a matter of fact, more
costs more. These situations are not a problem if you are willing to pay the
cost, but that is another problem...we think we are willing to pay it, and then
the bill comes. Crazy, huh?
I think
this dilemma has found its way into the modern church culture - the church
thinks that the more it has, the more it can do, so it needs to always be
getting and doing more. This is where the paradox enters the church and the
cycle of cost/benefit analysis starts. Before I chase some rabbit down some
number related rabbit hole, I want to state a new number: ZERO. No more more.
Because when it comes to church, founded by Christ and on Christ, the cost has
already been paid to complete the work that needs to be done = so the church
needs nothing, zip, zilch, zero, except Christ and His completed work on the
cross.
Wait a
minute you say, if zero is the number, then when it comes to outreach and
ministry how would that apply? I am in NO WAY saying the church does NOT need
resources, as a matter of fact what I am suggesting will require more resources
and more commitment. What I am suggesting is that instead of quantifying how
much or how many, we should be looking to get to zero. Yes...zero homeless,
zero hungry, zero broken families, zero people who have not heard the Good News
or experienced the love of Christ, zero, zero, zero. How's that for a number?
Working to end the problem and not just to see how many or how much we can
accomplish.
In the
early church, if the apostles and disciples based the continuation of their work
spreading the Gospel on numerical success, they might have stopped after a few
big successful events - "BOOM! Look at what we did! Thousands came to
believe today...that is enough." But they didn't. They started with the
goal of telling everyone, so that there would be zero people who had not heard
the good news, and when everyone is reached it would be mission accomplished. A
mission that is far from over (there are approximately 33 million unreached
people in California alone). A mission that is ours for the taking, that has as
its goal, the Great Commission (Matt. 28:16-20) and as its source for strength
to accomplish it, the Author of Life, God Himself. Sounds like a promising
venture.
Just a
side note...this is not a proposition seeking your help to ensure its
completion, this will happen, look up Revelation 7: 9-10. The Great Commission
will be fulfilled, the only question you have to wrestle with is whether or not
you want to help....so what is it?
Let's get
to ZERO...
In His grip,
Pastor Pat

You know I love this. We read the same Book and books, listen to the same speakers. We do not know how to do QUALITATIVE measurement, and therein may lie its true value. Rather than thinking "more is better", what if we thought "better is better"? If there is anyway for Christians and/or churches to gage this it might be with the simple question, "what would Jesus have me do?". that is different than asking "what would Jesus do?". To seek the answer is to live in constant communion with the Holy Spirit...never hang up the phone line when talking with Him. How I wish I could live that out!
ReplyDelete